|
Tuesday, 23 May 2006
The DaVinci Code: A Review
quote [ That Jesus was close to Mary Magdeline (probably a prostitute) is hinted at in the New Testament and confirmed in the Gnostic Gospels. Such would be the greatest love story ever, a gem shining in the shadows cast by the New Testament! ]
The movie gently opens the old scandalous ideas that Jesus was sexual, mortal, and that the church seeks hide his humanness while shaming and misleading ours.
Having not read The Da Vinci Code, as has some sixty million readers worldwide, I felt professionally obliged to see the movie. It did not shock me, but I’m used to these ideas. (I favor the more radical possibility that Jesus not only loved Mary Magdeline and fathered a child with her, but survived his crucifixion (with her and his mother’s help) and lived on to be her husband and father of their children in northern India, where he is buried.) In the Da Vinci Code, she left the scene pregnant and headed to France, where his descendents still live. Jesus is admitted to be a great man, but still a mortal, an inconvenient probability resented by the church.
[commentary] [by Brad@6:30pmGMT] [+1 Well Said] Saint Paul wrote, “If he did not rise, our faith is in vain.” Well, perhaps he didn’t and it is. Daring to think this is familiar in the Unitarian tradition. Theodore Parker, in the 19th century, claimed the truths of Christianity rest on themselves, not fantastic miracle stories. Orthodox Christianity has insisted Jesus was of God in a way we are not. To think that he had the love and sex of a woman and finally died undermines their faith. To the rest of us, if he was human, maybe we could be too, as true to our Creator as he was to his. Sex and death are not our enemies, the origin and results of our sins, but our human companions, our cause and conclusion. Christianity is utterly de-sexed, even anti-sex. Neither God, mother Mary, nor Jesus were seen to have anything to do with it, and Christians were mostly against it, to the point of celibacy and self-castration. Sexual women were shamed, tortured, and murdered by the thousands. That Jesus was close to Mary Magdeline (probably a prostitute) is hinted at in the New Testament and confirmed in the Gnostic Gospels. Such would be the greatest love story ever, a gem shining in the shadows cast by the New Testament! If they did have their love and even offspring, it has been secreted away from our knowing, just as women and sex have been shamed out of divine holiness and human wholeness. Sadly, these ideas only peek out of the movie’s story, obscured by a spooky plunge into tension and murder, typical Hollywood bang-bang, distancing us from the formidable reality of pain-loving dogmatists out to enforce blind belief. The Opus Dei albino monk Silas, a character representing white, zealatrous men, tries to keep the church’s secret secret, and kill the living heir of Jesus, a woman. He practices corporal-mortification, clinching a barbed cilice to his bloody thigh and whipping himself with a discipline (a knotted rope). It seems cartoonish, except Mother Teresa herself used to do the same things! We laugh off Opus Dei, avoiding the disturbing fact that it has 80,000 members world wide, four times larger than the Jesuits, and has been called by liberal Father Richard McBrien of Notre Dame, “…as close to a fascist organization [that there is] in the Catholic Church.” (See Peter Boyer’s review “Hollywood Heresy” in the May 22, 2006 New Yorker.) That the former pope and current one had ties to Opus Dei goes unmentioned. Could secret fanatic organizations be influencing church practice and world politics, as has happened in the past and could be true again today? From Texas to Tehran, humans are being subjected to fanatical zealotry, each side fervently insisting we obey their version of God’s Law. The more preposterous their claims, the more adamant their imposition. The greater their abhorrence of pleasure, the easier their resorting to pain on self and others. The cross and the jihad are raised and praised, as if godly. Women and sex are reviled, as if devilish. Fanatics seek to rile and rule again, just as they have hideously done in the past. The movie introduces hints of these possibilities to the general public. Hopefully, Christians won’t resort to reactionary backlash, but will engage in this ages-old consideration. I disagree with Paul - if he didn’t rise our faith isn’t in vain, but it is opened to the possibilities inherent in us as whole humans sometimes beset with pains but often alive with pleasures. Creation gives us life and death and allows our freedom and potentials. Have faith in that, not supernatural speculations imposed and protected for centuries. |
|
brf
said @ 9:33pm GMT on 28th May
Brad, I didn't see the movie (and probably won't unless it's shown on regular t.v.) but did read the book. While I certainly enjoyed reading your review (and agree with your personal comments about religious 'stuff'), I somehow believe the book had a different slant on things. Much (in the book) is mentioned concerning Opus Dei and the Holy Grail . If I recall correctly the book implies that the Holy Grail wasn't the cup Jesus drank from at the Last Supper but rather Mary M. Anyway, I'd suggest you read the book as I would surely welcome your comments on that. I look forward reading your complete sermon of May 28. Bernie |
|
Brad
said @ 8:48pm GMT on 9th Dec
Bernie, Just now saw your comments. If Mary Magdeline was the real sacred chalice it fits the anti-woman, anti-sexual nature of Christianity. The vagina is the goal (at least to us men) and the gate of life. But look what they did to Mother Mary. They needed a woman to have an actual birth for the man/god, but took away the sex. Imagine how much more scandalous would be a sexual relation between Jesus and Mary M. beyond the spiritual. See Elaine Pagels' books sharing new discoveries of old scriptures, e.g., The Gnostic Gospels. Many describe how Peter and others didn't want to honor Mary M., as Jesus had. Jesus not only kissed her on the mouth, he wanted her to teach. The more I know about Jesus the more I admire him; the more I know about Christianity the more annoying it gets. Brad |
|
passtheword
said @ 11:57pm GMT on 18th Feb
Hi there, Brad is your name, right? I did read the book, yet have not seen the movie. I think the story line of the book was exciting and very interesting. However, the points made about Christianity were almost totally false. Dan Brown did a poor job of research and made error after error after error. Just one small, but clear example...Brown is 100 years off when he mentions a 'fact' about Constantine's death. Oh well, for Brown, being 100 years off is no big deal. But that is just one small error in the midst of his huge major errors. His blunders about the Council of Nicea are much worse. Brad, your blog article is almost fully without basis in reality. Christians are not at all de-sexed nor are they anti-sex. That is just pure hogwash. It is interesting that you would make so many false statements in your blog, Brad. Why are you so vehemently opposed to Christianity? Your reasoning seems Satanic in its deceptive nature. If what you said about Christianity/Christians and sex was true, it is a wonder that any Christians are having sex and procreating at all. I thought we were anti-sex. Oh, I guess we are just against sex for anyone else, right Brad! Yeah, we are currently writing bills in the Senate and House in order to ask Bush to demand "No one except Christians can have sex in America!" COME ON, Brad! Grow up! |
|
Brad
said @ 5:55pm GMT on 26th Aug
Sorry for the delay in replying - long-standing computer/web site issues. Passtheword, your reaction seems overwrought. Christianity used to honor sex as it did the body. It often portrayed the bodily aspects of Jesus as an infant. But that worldly affirmation is eclipsed by a largely non-, or even anti-sexual stance in more recent times. Yes, Christians have sex and make babies, and no, I didn't suggest "no one except Christians can have sex in America," so please don't make up things I haven't said and then rail at me for your imagination. Nor is my reasoning "Satanic." I affirm sex as part of our good wholeness, and I think the shame is we're taught to be ashamed about it. I object to the traditional reading of Genesis 2 and 3 that stands the obvious teaching on its head. In this important creation myth at the foundation of the world's theistic religion's scriptures, Adam and Eve were naked and unashamed in Eden until they ate of the "knowledge of good and evil," resulting in their shame, blame, pain and expulsion. Their sin wasn't nudity or sex; it was being ashamed of it as a part of their new judgmental attitude. I don't believe in Satan, but I'm wary of those who do and then project it on those they don't understand or agree with. The extreme form of this is seen in the torturing of the witches until they confess to "sleeping with the devil." The huge Catholic Church won't allow contraception and teaches that sex is only allowable in marriage and then is only for procreation. That leads to overpopulation, largely in impoverished areas, straining the familial and societal resources to care for those many children well. You say, "Christians are not at all de-sexed nor are they anti-sex," yet where do we see any affirmation or celebration of sex in Christian pulpits? If there were any, it might be good, part of the goodness I affirm as inherent in the goods listed by God in Genesis One. I do have issues with Christianity, but my humanistic and naturalistic stance finally doesn't seek to fight with Christianity so much as to veer it back to worldly betterment. |
Earthlyreligion.com
is the publishing and communications tool of God’s Goods, a new
humanistic, naturalistic, deistic religion. (It also manages a labor
of love, “Rock
Walls.”)
Click “How to” for info
on logging in and how to work this site. By logging in you can view
documents and responses to them. You may add your comments and vote
up your favorite entry. We will not sell your name and info or release
it to any others, and we will not bother you with sales, appeals, or
other intrusions. Welcome! |